Self-made millionaire therapist and entrepreneur Tim Meyers has long been criticised by the scientific community for his laissez-faire approach to self scrutinisation of his popular “anatomy rails” treatment system.

Meyers spoke with The Good Health Tribune as part of a promotion for his latest book and professional development course for Physiotherapists, Chiropractors, Massage Therapists and other body workers alike. We asked Meyers to respond to his critics’ claims that his anatomy rails concepts are anti-scientific on the basis that they ascribe implausible physiological properties to fascial tissue.

“Well, the way I see things, science can’t explain everything, right? It’s not my fault the researchers can’t keep up with me. I don’t tend to worry too much about the negative research out there. In fact, I’ve grown tired of the constant haranguing from the ‘science based practitioners’ who are forever at me over what I do. The truth is though, that if I was wrong about fascia, my methods wouldn’t be helping all those thousands of people across the world.”

When we suggested that there may be an alternative, and more scientifically plausible explanation for the success of his method, Meyers paused, looking momentarily dim-witted before stating confidently, “I don’t need scientific plausibility or research to validate my work. I’ve transcended the scientific process… It’s no longer of any use to me”.

When asked if he had heard of recent research revealing a previously unknown contractile capacity of fascia tissue that might add weight to the plausibility of his anatomy rails concepts, Meyer’s eyebrows raised “You don’t say? Maybe you could email the abstract?”